Reprinted from NewsMax.com
Did the
U.S. Save Osama bin Laden?
Kenneth R. Timmerman,
NewsMax.com
Wednesday, April
12, 2006
Although the Dubai ports controversy may be disappearing,
questions linger about the role high-ranking United Arab Emirates
officials played in supporting Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida in the
years leading up to Sept. 11.
In fact, some U.S. government reports suggest that the United
States lost a clear opportunity to kill bin Laden because he was too
close to U.A.E. officials traveling in his entourage –
officials Clinton security adviser Richard Clarke may have thought
were too important to harm.
On Feb. 8, 1999, the Pentagon and the CIA were preparing a
military strike on a luxury hunting camp in the desert south of
Kandahar, Afghanistan, where Osama bin Laden had been sighted.
There were problems, however.
Satellite imagery revealed the presence of a military aircraft
belonging to the U.A.E., and "policymakers were concerned about the
danger that a strike would kill an Emirati prince or other senior
officials who might be with bin Laden or close by," according to the
9/11 Commission report.
Who were these U.S. "policymakers" mentioned in the 9/11 report
who thwarted the opportunity to kill one of the world's most wanted
men?
The report does not say.
Coincidentally, the Clinton administration National Security
Council advisor, Richard Clarke, had just returned to the United
States from consultations with Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, chief of
staff of the U.A.E. armed forces, regarding a proposed sale of F-16s
to the Gulf state as well as counter-terrorism issues, according to
the report.
Clarke revealed to the 9/11 Commission that during a one-on-one
meeting with Sheikh Mohammad, the sheikh had "vehemently denied
rumors that high-level U.A.E. officials were in Afghanistan" hunting
with bin Laden.
Clarke said the failure to strike bin Laden was a CIA
decision.
The proposed air strike was called off four days later "after
consultations with [CIA] Director [George] Tenet
because the intelligence was dubious," Clarke told the Commission.
But the CIA contested Clarke's assertions, as did former Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Hugh Shelton.
And according to Alan Parrot, an Arabist and falconry expert
who became close to Sheikh Mohammad's father, U.A.E. leader Sheikh
Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahayan, there was never any question that bin
Laden was present at the luxury hunting camp in southern Afghanistan
along with top U.A.E. officials.
"Osama bin Laden's hunting partner was none other than Sheikh
Hamdan bin Zayed, the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates,
and a full brother of the sheikh who signed the F-16 deal," Parrot
told NewsMax.
Sheikh Hamdan stayed in Afghanistan for three full weeks during
the 1999 hunt, Parrot said, while supplies were ferried back and
forth to the luxury camp by a U.A.E. Ministry of Defense C-130 cargo
aircraft.
Falconry camps are a favorite pastime of the Arab world's
elites – a place where leaders meet, and business deals are
conducted. For bin Laden and his al-Qaida, falconry provided a
similar networking opportunity.
"The falcon camps were al-Qaida's board room," Parrot said.
"This is where bin Laden went to meet with political leaders and
money men" from Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E.
Parrot works for the Union for the Conservation of Raptors
(www.savethefalcons.org), and has provided legally acquired wild
falcons to many top Arab leaders.
Parrot's conservationist group has been working for 20 years to save
endangered falcons, preserve their habitat, and expose illegal
trafficking. "We stumbled upon bin Laden's activities during our
field work in Central Asia, when we saw the world's worst criminals
coming into these camps and photographed them."
According to Parrot, bin Laden often stayed for four weeks at a
time in the camps, while the Gulf royals hunted in Toyota Land
Cruisers and feasted in million-dollar air-conditioned tents the size
of palaces. "The falcon camps were more important to al-Qaida than
the military training camps," Parrot said.
After the U.S. air strike was called off, bin Laden and the
U.A.E. royals continued hunting, apparently oblivious to the
potential danger. Then on March 7, 1999, Richard Clarke called Sheikh
Mohammad bin Zayed again, to "express his concerns about possible
associations between Emirati officials and bin Laden," the 9/11
Commission report states.
It is not clear if Clarke ever mentioned that U.S. intelligence
had evidence that U.A.E. officials were in fact with bin Laden in
Afghanistan – but after the call the group that included bin
Laden and his U.A.E. friends quickly dispersed and the camps were
dismantled.
Gary Schroen, the first CIA operations officer to enter
Afghanistan after 9/11 to plan the U.S.-led war against al-Qaida,
complained bitterly to the Commission that Clarke's actions had
scuttled a good opportunity to kill bin Laden before 9/11.
Clarke claims the CIA had signed off on the "tip-off" call to
U.A.E. armed forces chief Sheikh Mohammad.
However, former CIA official John Mayer III told the Commission it
was "almost impossible" for the CIA to have approved Clarke's
move.
"When the former bin Laden unit chief found out about Clarke's
call, he questioned CIA officials, who denied having given such a
clearance," the report states. "Imagery confirmed that less than a
week after Clarke's phone call the camp was hurriedly dismantled, and
the site was deserted."
Asked by NewsMax to comment on his reported "tip-off" to the
U.A.E. sheikh, Clarke said, "I'm not going to get into that. What I
said to the 9/11 Commission is what I said to the 9/11
Commission."
If the U.A.E. had been tipped off to a pending U.S. military strike,
one motive had been the Clinton administration's desire to save the
deal to sell F-16s to the U.A.E.
Had Sheikh Hamdan or other U.A.E. officials been killed during
a U.S. air strike on bin Laden, it could have seriously damaged the
$6.4 billion F-16 deal, the details of which were still being
negotiated with the U.A.E.
The deal to sell 80 jets to the U.A.E., signed in 1998 but
stalled for another two years, was described by Lockheed sources as
the company's "largest single F-16 sale outside of Israel."
Lockheed describes the jets on its Web site as "the latest and most
advanced version" of the F-16. The U.A.E. was "the lead customer" for
the upgraded F-16, Lockheed says. But getting the U.A.E. to buy the
U.S. jets proved an arduous task that took more than a decade to
finalize.
Sheikh Mohammad bin Zayed, chief arms purchaser for the Arab
sheikhdom, openly courted the French and threatened repeatedly to
purchase Dassault Aviation Mirage 2000 jets if the U.S. wouldn't give
the U.A.E. access to the very latest radar and avionics package.
"The U.A.E. wanted on-board equipment that was more advanced
than what we had sold the Israeli Air Force," a former U.S. official
with first-hand knowledge of the negotiations told NewsMax.
"In the end, the Israelis agreed to allow the deal to go through, if
the U.A.E. footed the bill for development costs" of key
modifications, which are now being shared with Israel.
A Lockheed spokesman in Washington, D.C., Hal Rhoven, told
NewsMax he could not comment by phone on "any story relating to the
U.A.E."
The commercial contract between Lockheed and the U.A.E. was
finalized in March 2000, one year after Richard Clarke's "tip-off"
call may have allowed the U.A.E. to dismantle the luxury hunting camp
in Afghanistan and hastily fly its officials out of harm's way.
Congress cleared the deal just three months later.
The first Block 60 "Desert Falcon" aircraft were delivered in May
2005, and include an APG-80 agile beam radar, an internalized
forward-looking infrared targeting system, a new cockpit, internal
electronic counter measures, enhanced-performance F110-GE-132 engine,
and conformal fuel tanks, according to GlobalSecurity.org.
New evidence continues to emerge that a golden opportunity to
kill bin Laden had been missed.
In late February 2006, the Pentagon released several thousand
pages of documents relating to the interrogation of prisoners at
Guantanamo Bay.
Among them was a time line of the interrogation of Detainee number
063, identified as Mohammad al-Qatani.
"Al-Qatani was Osama bin Laden's falconer," Parrot said. "In
the transcript, he states clearly that he received orders and
material assistance from persons in the U.A.E. to go to Afghanistan
to smuggle falcons."
The FBI has identified al-Qatani as the 20th hijacker, who was
turned away by immigration officials in Orlando, Fla., while 9/11
terrorist Mohamed al-Atta was waiting to pick him up in the airport
parking lot.
After his failure to link up with the other 9/11 hijackers,
al-Qatani returned to Afghanistan and was eventually picked up by
U.S. forces while attempting to flee from Tora Bora in November
2001.
Parrot believes al-Qatani was present at the hunting camp near
Kandahar at the same time top U.A.E. sheikhs were hunting, and that
he helped bring in cars and other supplies from the U.A.E. to bin
Laden and the sheikhs at the camp, in exchange for falcons.
The recently released interrogation log, stamped "Secret
ORCON," states that al-Qatani "visited a place near Kandahar where
people from the Gulf states would meet to hunt falcons ... When asked
how he knew about this meeting location of Gulf state personnel, he
stated 'Z' from U.A.E. had told him about this meeting place."
The log does not identify "Z," but Parrot believes it could be
a reference to the U.A.E. president, Sheikh Zayed, an avid
falconer.